Yeah, that's what I feel. Simply because he makes movies which run for 4 hours. Isn't that ridiculous, had it been a Hollywood production, they would made 3 sequels out of that. That's how the Hollywood industry survives I think.
Coming to Mr. Johar. he puts all his money into one movie which runs for 4 hours, has around 5 leading actors of Bollywood and shoots in all exotic locations around the world. God knows whether he makes any profit out of it and how he manages that. Well for sure his movies run houseful. But he can also have 3 houseful movies instead, as it is Shahrukh's movies are bound to run houseful and K.J. doesn't know how to make movies without Shahrukh.
So I would advice KJ, to take Shahrukh and make 3 movies in the same budget and make more money.
The other problem with his movies, he doesn't how much problem it causes to the audiences. For once, the movie shows that start at 10 or 11 PM run into odd hours of night/morning. And when I went to a theatre to watch KANK at 11 PM I couldn't find a parking. Cannot blame the theatre owners. They cant help it. See for 11 PM show we would arrive at 10:45 at least. So at that point, we would have 4 shows running, 7,8,9 and 10 PM shows. All houseful.
And another disadvantage you cannot release a DVD version with uncut scenes. Come on, it already has 4 hours of movie. With 1 interval. He should at least give a second interval. Poor audiences.
And see Ram Gopal Verma, he makes 1.5 hr movies with all new actors. Who cares if the movie flops. The money is back.. Because some people would definitely go to see the girls and nach-gana, isn't it?
I tell you KJ had made 1/3rd of the profit, he could have made out of KANK, had he released it in sequels. You bet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment